Skip to main content

Marathon Digital bungles crypto impairment sums, will reissue financials

The Bitcoin miner received a letter from the Securities and Exchange Commission highlighting accounting mistakes it made on multiple financial disclosures.

Bitcoin (BTC) miner Marathon Digital will reissue a number of previous financial statements after the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pointed out some accounting errors the firm made.

According to a Feb. 27 SEC filing, Marathon will restate its unaudited Q1, Q2, and Q3 quarterly reports from both 2021 and 2022 in addition to its audited annual report from 2021.

Marathon noted that affected financial statements, related earnings releases and other financial communications during these periods “should not be relied upon.”

The issues highlighted by the SEC on Feb. 22 were Marathon’s method for calculating impairment on digital assets, as well as Marathon’s determination that it had acted as an agent while operating a Bitcoin mining pool rather than a principal.

A principal is an entity that has the legal authority for decisions, while an agent is an entity that can only act on behalf of a principal.

Marathon noted that by changing the determination of its role in operating the pool from an agent to a principal, revenues and cost of revenues will see minor increases but does not believe the change will impact its bottom line.

“The restatement of the Impacted Financial Statements is not expected to have any impact on total margin, operating income or net income in 2021 or in any of the interim periods in 2021 or 2022.”

As a result of the accounting issues, Marathon postponed its fourth-quarter 2022 earnings call, which was set to take place on Feb. 28, and will postpone the publication of its corresponding financial results.

Marathon intends to file its results for 2022 by March 16. It has notified the SEC it would take up to 15 days to make the necessary corrections to the report, which was previously due by March 1.

Related: Robinhood subpoenaed by SEC over crypto listings and custody

The miner announced on Feb. 2 that it had sold 1,500 BTC throughout January, marking the first time it had sold Bitcoin since Oct. 1, 2020, as it looks to build up a “war chest” of both cash and Bitcoin and ensure it can be flexible throughout 2023.

While 2022 proved to be a tough year for Bitcoin miners — leading to the capitulation of firms such as Core Scientific in December — an increasing BTC price and stable electricity prices have helped the industry rebound strongly so far in 2023, with production and hash rates generally up across the board.



from https://ift.tt/obTW0ce
https://ift.tt/bRqzDn7
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Any questions, Please.

Popular posts from this blog

ENS DAO delegates offer perspective on DAO governance and decentralized identity

AlphaWallet CEO and Spruce co-founder talk about their roles as contributors to the Ethereum Name Service following the project's recent airdrop. Earlier this month, the Ethereum Name Service, or ENS, formed a decentralized autonomous organization, or DAO, for the ENS community.  Cointelegraph spoke to two ENS DAO delegates who applied for the opportunity to represent the community and stay involved in the decision making process: Victor Zhang, CEO of AlphaWallet, an open source Ethereum wallet, and Gregory Rocco, co-founder of Spruce, a decentralized ID and data toolkit for developers. Zhang spoke about his experience as an external contributor to ENS and an early supporter since 2018. Zhang initially sought to help ENS by offering Alpha Wallet as a user-friendly tool for  resolving .eth names and cryptocurrency wallet addresses. Essentially, if a user inputs an .eth name in the AlphaWallet, it will show the wallet address, and vice versa using reverse resolution. Alpha...
Post a Comment
Read more

How Social Platform Chingari is Using Web 3.0 to Transform the Traditional Way We Use Social Media

The world is changing. This isn’t news to anyone, but sometimes it is nice to realize that—contrary to news headlines—not all the change is bad.  In fact, the last decade has seen so much innovation and so many improvements to technology that even 2015 seems like a different world.  Internet speeds, connecting with anyone globally (for free), and our ability to reach large groups of people without a middleman is nothing short of revolutionary. When it comes to technology evolution, this often happens with different iterations.  Once a system is mature, there’s a better idea of what we would like to change and improve.  We go back to the drawing board, target our creative minds at the issues, and create a new version that has evolved to better meet our needs.  The Internet has followed this model since its inception, evolving through three distinct stages.  We are only at the cusp of the third stage, called Web 3.0, with technologies such as blockchain and ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Osprey sues Grayscale for misrepresenting likelihood of GBTC ETF approval

Osprey alleges its only competitor on the BTC OTC trust asset market gained its 99.5% market share by misrepresenting the likelihood of its trust becoming an ETF. Digital asset manager Osprey Funds filed suit against Grayscale Investments in Connecticut Superior Court on Jan. 30, alleging violation of the state’s Unfair Trade Practices Act. The suit concerns Grayscale advertising and promotion of the Bitcoin ( BTC ) exchange-traded fund (ETF) it is seeking to create.  Osprey stated in the suit that it is the only competitor to Grayscale on the over-the-counter traded Bitcoin trust asset management market, and Grayscale maintained its leading position through deceit: “Only because of its false and misleading advertising and promotion has Grayscale been able to maintain to date approximately 99.5% market share in a two-participant market despite charging more than four times the asset management fee that Osprey charges for its services.” Specifically, Osprey alleged that Graysc...
Post a Comment
Read more