Skip to main content

Bitcoin bulls remain in charge even in the face of increasing regulatory FUD

BTC’s correction to $22,750 followed negative remarks from financial regulators, but key Bitcoin price metrics show bulls remain optimistic.

Bitcoin (BTC) price broke above $25,000 on Feb. 21, accruing a 53% year-to-date gain at the time, it made sense to expect the rally to continue after U.S. retail sales data from the previous week vastly surpassed the market consensus. This fuelled investors' hope for a soft landing and the possible aversion of a recession in the U.S. economy. 

The apex of the U.S. Federal Reserve’s strategy success would be increasing interest rates and scaling back its $9 trillion balance sheet reduction without significatively damaging the economy. If that miracle happens, the outcome would benefit risk assets, including stocks, commodities and Bitcoin.

Unfortunately, the cryptocurrency markets took a hit after the $25,200 level was rejected and Bitcoin price plunged 10% between Feb. 21 and Feb. 24. Regulatory pressure, mainly from the U.S., partially explains investors' rationale for the worsening market conditions.

In a Feb. 23 New York Magazine interview, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Gary Gensler claimed "everything other than Bitcoin" is potentially a security instrument and falls under the agency's jurisdiction. However, multiple lawyers and policy analysts commented that Gensler's opinion is "not the law." Hence, the SEC had no authority to regulate cryptocurrencies unless it proved its case in court.

Additionally, at a G20 meeting, U.S. Secretary Janet Yellen stressed the importance of implementing a strong regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. Yellen's remarks on Feb. 25 followed the International Monetary Fund (IMF) managing director Kristalina Georgieva pointing out that "if regulation fails," then outright banning "should not be "taken off the table."

Let's look at Bitcoin derivatives metrics to better understand how professional traders are positioned in the current market conditions.

Asia-based stablecoin demand is stagnant

Traders should refer to the USD Coin (USDC) premium to measure the demand for cryptocurrency in Asia. The index measures the difference between China-based peer-to-peer stablecoin trades and the United States dollar.

Excessive cryptocurrency buying demand can pressure the indicator above fair value at 104%. On the other hand, the stablecoin's market offer is flooded during bearish markets, causing a 4% or higher discount.

USDC peer-to-peer vs. USD/CNY. Source: OKX

After peaking at 4% in late January, the USDC premium indicator in Asian markets has declined to a neutral 2%. The metric has since stabilized at a modest 2.5% premium, which should be interpreted as positive considering the recent regulatory FUD.

BTC’s futures premium stuck even after price rejected at $25,000

Bitcoin's quarterly futures are the preferred instruments of whales and arbitrage desks. Due to their settlement date and the price difference from spot markets, they might seem complicated for retail traders. However, their most notable advantage is the lack of a fluctuating funding rate.

These fixed-month contracts usually trade at a slight premium to spot markets, indicating that sellers are requesting more money to withhold settlement longer. Consequently, futures markets should trade at a 5% to 10% annualized premium on healthy markets. This situation is known as contango and is not exclusive to crypto markets.

Bitcoin 2-month futures annualized premium. Source: Laevitas.ch

The chart shows traders flirting with the neutral sentiment between Feb. 19 and Feb. 24 as the Bitcoin price held above $23,750. However, the indicator failed to enter the neutral-to-bearish 0% to 5% area as additional regulatory uncertainty was added, especially after Gensler's remarks on Feb. 23. As a result, it became clear that pro traders were not comfortable with Bitcoin price breaking above $25,000.

Related: Is the SEC’s action against BUSD more about Binance than stablecoins?

Weak economic data shifted control to the bulls

Since Feb. 25, Bitcoin price has gained 4.5%, indicating that the impact of the regulatory newsflow has been limited. More importantly, the global stock market reacted positively on Feb. 27 after the U.S. Commerce Department reported durable goods orders down 4.5% in January versus the previous month. This data added pressure for the U.S. FED to reduce its interest rate hike program earlier than expected.

Since Bitcoin's 50-day correlation with the S&P 500 futures presently stands at 83%, cryptocurrency traders are more inclined to support risk asset prices strengthening throughout the week. A correlation indicator above 70% indicates that both assets are moving in tandem, meaning the macroeconomic scenario is likely playing a pivotal role in determining the overall trend.

Unless there's added pressure from regulators or conflicting economic data, odds favor Bitcoin bulls considering the BTC futures and Asian stablecoin metrics.

The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the authors’ alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.



from https://ift.tt/xPFCvm2
https://ift.tt/93H4aYZ

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Social Platform Chingari is Using Web 3.0 to Transform the Traditional Way We Use Social Media

The world is changing. This isn’t news to anyone, but sometimes it is nice to realize that—contrary to news headlines—not all the change is bad.  In fact, the last decade has seen so much innovation and so many improvements to technology that even 2015 seems like a different world.  Internet speeds, connecting with anyone globally (for free), and our ability to reach large groups of people without a middleman is nothing short of revolutionary. When it comes to technology evolution, this often happens with different iterations.  Once a system is mature, there’s a better idea of what we would like to change and improve.  We go back to the drawing board, target our creative minds at the issues, and create a new version that has evolved to better meet our needs.  The Internet has followed this model since its inception, evolving through three distinct stages.  We are only at the cusp of the third stage, called Web 3.0, with technologies such as blockchain and ...

ENS DAO delegates offer perspective on DAO governance and decentralized identity

AlphaWallet CEO and Spruce co-founder talk about their roles as contributors to the Ethereum Name Service following the project's recent airdrop. Earlier this month, the Ethereum Name Service, or ENS, formed a decentralized autonomous organization, or DAO, for the ENS community.  Cointelegraph spoke to two ENS DAO delegates who applied for the opportunity to represent the community and stay involved in the decision making process: Victor Zhang, CEO of AlphaWallet, an open source Ethereum wallet, and Gregory Rocco, co-founder of Spruce, a decentralized ID and data toolkit for developers. Zhang spoke about his experience as an external contributor to ENS and an early supporter since 2018. Zhang initially sought to help ENS by offering Alpha Wallet as a user-friendly tool for  resolving .eth names and cryptocurrency wallet addresses. Essentially, if a user inputs an .eth name in the AlphaWallet, it will show the wallet address, and vice versa using reverse resolution. Alpha...

Meta's head of crypto to step down at end of year

In explaining his decision to leave Meta, David Marcus said that his entrepreneurial DNA had been nudging him “for too many mornings in a row to continue ignoring.” David Marcus, the head of Meta’s cryptocurrency and fintech unit Novi, will step down from his role by the end of 2021. Taking over from Marcus will be Stephane Kasriel, the former CEO of Upwork who has been at Meta, formerly known as Facebook, since August 2020. Marcus announced the decision via a Dec. 1 tweet , noting that he had made the “difficult decision” to leave the firm by the end of this year. The exec didn’t go into detail about what his next move would be, but hinted that it may be something “new and exciting” that he builds himself: “While there’s still so much to do right on the heels of launching Novi — and I remain as passionate as ever about the need for change in our payments and financial systems — my entrepreneurial DNA has been nudging me for too many mornings in a row to continue ignoring it.” Ma...