Skip to main content

New free-to-own GameFi model is ‘high risk,’ according to CZ

The blockchain gaming firm in question raised over $200 million on Monday to further its NFT operations.

Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, CEO of Binance, criticized the creation of a novel “free-to-own” business model in the GameFi space on Tuesday, writing:

“If everything will be free in the world, why do we have to work so hard...”

The Binance CEO then explained that nothing is absolutely free, pointing to how the exchange can offer zero trading fees for Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH) pairs because of the adequate revenue generated from other trading pairs. He added that new projects that allow players to sign up for free can be high risk for early adopters.

The firm facing the brunt of CZ’s criticism is gaming startup Limit Break, which raised $200 million in venture capital funding on Aug. 29. The project gained popularity with the launch of a free-mint NFT collection called DigiDaigaku.

At inception, the community is able to begin for free, possessing ownership of NFTs that, in turn, act as factories that generate new NFTs for gameplay and cosmetics. The idea is that since the NFTs are given for free, players aren’t pressured to recoup the cost of their investment as quickly as possible, and can therefore stay and play the game for much longer.

Ryan Foo, a game economist at Delphi Digital, said that Limit Break only takes a 10% transaction fee on NFTs. In the weeks since the NFTs’ release, approximately 3,900 ETH worth of collectibles has been traded, resulting in a book revenue of over $600,000.

In recent months, blockchain games have faced severe criticism from gaming industry veterans for their focus on “making money” instead of enjoyment. For example, Mojang Studios, creator of Minecraft, said that it would ban NFT integrations, citing the “speculative pricing” and “investment mentality” that take away from the game experience.



from https://ift.tt/rwZcGx7
https://ift.tt/JEMYm1l

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

DeFi isn’t dead, it just needs to fix these 3 critical problems

It’s been a rough year for DeFi, and it may not get any better until projects focus more on security, regulation and usability. The persistent challenges  decentralized finance  face have been well documented by a handful of analysts and the recent collapse of the Terra ecosystem re-enforced the fact that something is critically wrong with DeFi. I think DeFi today is completely broken for 99% of the population. The promise of a more transparent financial system has been overtaken by greed. UST/LUNA is just the latest in a string of bad developments: — Peter Yang (@petergyang) May 11, 2022 Let's take a look at what experts say DeFi needs to do in order to have another revival.  Improved usability To date, the promise of open and uncensored access to a global decentralized financial system has been largely hampered by the complicated interface, confusing multi-step staking processes and lack of clarity surrounding the yields on various tokens. What do you thi...

ENS DAO delegates offer perspective on DAO governance and decentralized identity

AlphaWallet CEO and Spruce co-founder talk about their roles as contributors to the Ethereum Name Service following the project's recent airdrop. Earlier this month, the Ethereum Name Service, or ENS, formed a decentralized autonomous organization, or DAO, for the ENS community.  Cointelegraph spoke to two ENS DAO delegates who applied for the opportunity to represent the community and stay involved in the decision making process: Victor Zhang, CEO of AlphaWallet, an open source Ethereum wallet, and Gregory Rocco, co-founder of Spruce, a decentralized ID and data toolkit for developers. Zhang spoke about his experience as an external contributor to ENS and an early supporter since 2018. Zhang initially sought to help ENS by offering Alpha Wallet as a user-friendly tool for  resolving .eth names and cryptocurrency wallet addresses. Essentially, if a user inputs an .eth name in the AlphaWallet, it will show the wallet address, and vice versa using reverse resolution. Alpha...

How much is too much? Crypto art market brings together deep pockets and big artists

In the future, owning unique art won’t be restricted to the elites, but will everyone have digital art on their walls? With the nonfungible token market approaching the frothing point, perhaps it’s time to sit back and ask: “What’s happening here?” The $750,000 in proceeds from the recent sale of a single “alien” CypherPunk NFT, after all, could have paid for a reasonably sized house. The crypto world at large is only 12 years old, entering adolescence, but crypto art — art on a blockchain — and nonfungible tokens are just out of their terrible twos. The launch of an epoch-defining CryptoKitties goes back to 2017 and 2018, and Ethereum’s nonfungible token, ERC-721 — which is used by many digital galleries and also non-art NFTs — wasn’t developed and rolled out until early 2018. What is being discussed here is still very new. Moreover, Bitcoin ( BTC ), the world’s first blockchain project, was initially just a more efficient way to transfer money, though it soon became more — a k...