Skip to main content

3 reasons why Ethereum PoW hard fork tokens won’t gain traction

A lack of oracle support, the majority of DApps being supportive of the Merge and Ethereum Classic's minimal developer activity suggests that PoW hard forks will fizzle.

Ether (ETH) is the second largest crypto by market capitalization and the absolute leader in decentralized applications by deposits. Becoming a victim of its own success, the network experienced a fee hike in November 2021 when the average transaction costs surpassed $50. 

That's precisely why the Merge is a critical step to implementing a fully functional scaling solution. The confirmation of a transition to a proof-ofstake (PoS) consensus was the main driver for the rally toward $2,000 on Aug. 15.

Investors were partially excited about the reduced issuing schedule and likely a transition to a deflationary scenario, but there's also the expectation of upcoming forks. As a result, hard-forked coins may be awarded to Ether holders on different blockchains, even though there's no guarantee those will find traction or sufficient liquidity.

From one side, there's the temptation of free money and even bonus non-fungible tokens (NFTs) as the forked chain will initiate with the same state of the original Ethereum network, meaning each address will hold the exact same contents in terms of tokens and transaction history.

On the other hand, there's also a sense of disappointment after Ether’s agonizing 29% correction that took place after the $2,000 resistance proved to be more challenging than expected. It’s possible that as investors realized that the practical utility of the forks would be much lower than anticipated, the exuberant expectation of free money dissipated, and reality kicked in.

ETHPoW, for now, is a possible new chain backed by proof-of-work (PoW) miners. Some exchanges have initiated futures trading for the fork chain native asset, ETHW. Markets seem to have given their opinion, as the contract is now trading below $55 at Poloniex and Gate.io.

There’s no backing and oracle support for forked stablecoins

The two leading stablecoins, namely USD Coin (USDC) and Tether (USDT), have officially confirmed intentions to exclusively support the Ethereum Foundation-backed Merge chain. Cointelegraph previously reported that given that the two stablecoins dominate, the issuers' support "should result in a smooth transition for Ethereum."

Meanwhile, the core team behind EthereumPoW (ETHW) said they would temporarily freeze tokens in certain liquidity pools of DeFi applications to protect user assets after the hard fork.

The idea of freezing users' assets without their consent didn't go well with many. Some users called the Twitter account behind EthereumPoW a scam because the community has voted on no such change.

DApps go beyond merely facilitating transactions because, as they interact with external data, request off-chain computing and this is where blockchain oracle technology comes into play.

Chainlink enhances smart contracts by linking them with real-world data, events and transactions. In an official announcement on Aug. 8, the protocol revealed that its services would remain on the Ethereum PoS blockchain which is supported by the Ethereum Foundation.

Related: MakerDAO co-founder recommends DAI-USD depegging to limit the attack surface

Leading DApps will incentivize users to ditch forked tokens

On Aug. 16, Aave (AAVE) holders were asked to take part in voting to" commit" to Ethereum's PoS consensus, giving power to an authority to shut down any Aave deployments on any alternative Ethereum forks.

Despite being designed exclusively as an Ethereum application, Aave has become interchain over the years and currently has its official versions running on Avalanche, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, Fantom and Harmony.

Investors are starting to realize that the DApps and stablecoins will not support forked chains, meaning the “free” tokens and NFTs are less likely to be accepted in marketplaces and leading DeFi applications. Regardless of the ETHPoW token value, the utility of the PoS network supported by the Ethereum Foundation far exceeds the utility of competing chains.

Ethereum Classic never gained traction

Ethereum Classic (ETC) is a pre-existing example that supports the thesis that a competing chain will not undermine Ether's (ETH) price. The original hard fork followed a 2016 consensus change and aimed to reverse a $60 million exploit. The DApps on this competing proof-of-work (PoW) chain never gained traction despite its $4.5 billion market capitalization.

Current data suggests that Ether traders should disregard the upcoming forks and focus on the roadmap toward scalability and whether or not the network maintains its position as the leader by total value locked.

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision.



from https://ift.tt/XUqWxAH
https://ift.tt/2ZsrHqh
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Any questions, Please.

Popular posts from this blog

ENS DAO delegates offer perspective on DAO governance and decentralized identity

AlphaWallet CEO and Spruce co-founder talk about their roles as contributors to the Ethereum Name Service following the project's recent airdrop. Earlier this month, the Ethereum Name Service, or ENS, formed a decentralized autonomous organization, or DAO, for the ENS community.  Cointelegraph spoke to two ENS DAO delegates who applied for the opportunity to represent the community and stay involved in the decision making process: Victor Zhang, CEO of AlphaWallet, an open source Ethereum wallet, and Gregory Rocco, co-founder of Spruce, a decentralized ID and data toolkit for developers. Zhang spoke about his experience as an external contributor to ENS and an early supporter since 2018. Zhang initially sought to help ENS by offering Alpha Wallet as a user-friendly tool for  resolving .eth names and cryptocurrency wallet addresses. Essentially, if a user inputs an .eth name in the AlphaWallet, it will show the wallet address, and vice versa using reverse resolution. Alpha...
Post a Comment
Read more

How Social Platform Chingari is Using Web 3.0 to Transform the Traditional Way We Use Social Media

The world is changing. This isn’t news to anyone, but sometimes it is nice to realize that—contrary to news headlines—not all the change is bad.  In fact, the last decade has seen so much innovation and so many improvements to technology that even 2015 seems like a different world.  Internet speeds, connecting with anyone globally (for free), and our ability to reach large groups of people without a middleman is nothing short of revolutionary. When it comes to technology evolution, this often happens with different iterations.  Once a system is mature, there’s a better idea of what we would like to change and improve.  We go back to the drawing board, target our creative minds at the issues, and create a new version that has evolved to better meet our needs.  The Internet has followed this model since its inception, evolving through three distinct stages.  We are only at the cusp of the third stage, called Web 3.0, with technologies such as blockchain and ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Osprey sues Grayscale for misrepresenting likelihood of GBTC ETF approval

Osprey alleges its only competitor on the BTC OTC trust asset market gained its 99.5% market share by misrepresenting the likelihood of its trust becoming an ETF. Digital asset manager Osprey Funds filed suit against Grayscale Investments in Connecticut Superior Court on Jan. 30, alleging violation of the state’s Unfair Trade Practices Act. The suit concerns Grayscale advertising and promotion of the Bitcoin ( BTC ) exchange-traded fund (ETF) it is seeking to create.  Osprey stated in the suit that it is the only competitor to Grayscale on the over-the-counter traded Bitcoin trust asset management market, and Grayscale maintained its leading position through deceit: “Only because of its false and misleading advertising and promotion has Grayscale been able to maintain to date approximately 99.5% market share in a two-participant market despite charging more than four times the asset management fee that Osprey charges for its services.” Specifically, Osprey alleged that Graysc...
Post a Comment
Read more