Skip to main content

Why Consent Matters In Brave & BAT


 

Brave Browser and all other Brave Inc associated products require the consent of their users before ads or other sponsored content is shown to them. Many Brave community members may see this as a positive step towards data protection and privacy. However, this consent system is far more critical to Brave than you might think.

Without the consent of users, Brave wouldn't be allowed to show ads at all. Why? because Brave doesn't own the content. Brave Browser shows ads when people use it to browse the web. The content or websites people visit are not owned by Brave. Hence, it is illegal for Brave to show ads in them. If Brave shows ads without user consent, the content producers will sue Brave and forcibly shut it down.

In fact, some publishers tried to shut Brave down even before it could materialize. Wired reported on April, 2016:

Earlier this year, Eich's company Brave Software unveiled a browser that automatically blocks third-party ads and blocking scripts. Such a tool would be controversial enough on its own, but Brave wants to go further by replacing those ads with its own more privacy-friendly ads and giving 70 percent of the revenue to publishers.

Although the preview version of the Brave browser doesn't yet replace ads, publishers already are fighting back. This week the Newspaper Association of America, which represents more than 1,200 newspapers, sent Eich a letter that called his scheme "blatantly illegal" and promised legal action if Brave Software follows through on its plans. ...

Because Brave seeks to profit from how it modifies pages, it might be treated differently from other tools that rearrange or otherwise alter web content. ...

For example, in the early aughts, software called Gator replaced banner ads with its own advertisements. A coalition of publishers, including Dow Jones and the The New York Times, sued the company behind Gator, which settled the case and changed its business model.

The reason they couldn't do anything to Brave is because of the opt-in strategy. Brave's opt-in strategy is a shield against such allegations. Cause the user is the one making the decision to view Brave Ads not Brave Inc.

In other networks, users do not have a choice to disable ads. Hence, those networks have to serve content produced by or licensed to them. Facebook can't legally monetize videos posted on YouTube.

It came under severe criticism after Kurgsagt made a video about how Facebook makes money out of monetizing other people's YouTube content. Some plagiarists were copying YouTube videos and posting them on Facebook to get more views. This is illegal since Facebook is making money out of other people's content without their consent.

In the Brave ecosystem, Brave won't have to go through such hustle as the consent system ensures that Brave isn't imposing things on its users. Hence, the liability is on the user's end.

It provides a better user experience in the sense that it is allowing the users to choose whether they want to see ads or not. And the users earn money for watching ads which aligns the interests of users with the interests of Brave.

Brave has built its business model with user privacy and data security in mind. Brave Ads use client side ad matching that keeps user data in the physical device of the user. The client downloads a catalog of ads from the server. No user information is sent to the servers except those that are absolutely necessary and that too with user consent.

Brave also has the option to delete browsing data on exit which many browsers do not offer. You can find that option in settings > clear browsing data.



The consent system empowers the users and lets them choose what they want. Here's how Brendan Eich, CEO of Brave explains it:

"Our model is to cut out the adtech middlemen who take up to 70% or more from the gross ad spend by top notch tracking protection,and with opt in, give savings to ad slot owners: users now (70%), and with publisher ads soon, pubs (70%) and users (15%).

We thus take fixed and same or lesser fee as user, and give 70% fixed to the ads slot owner (you for user ads if you opt info Brave Rewards; publishers soon for pub ads). This is all consent-based, direct via browser.

Never user data or traces in cleartext on our servers. If you don’t like it enough to opt in and stay in, then we lose. By aligning our interests with yours, making <= what you make on Brave Ads, we turn the adtech model upside down & put users first. Will it work? We are not profitable yet but building revenue up via opted-in user growth." - Brendan Eich

Thank you for reading. You can download the Brave Browser from here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

TA: Ethereum Remains Strong, Why ETH Could Rally Above $2.3K

Ethereum is trading in a positive zone above the $2,150 support zone the 100 hourly SMA against the US Dollar. ETH price is likely to rally if there is a clear break above $2,300. Ethereum is trading in a positive zone above the $2,100 and $2,150 support levels. The price is now trading above $2,100 and the 100 hourly simple moving average. There is a key bullish trend line forming with support near $2,140 on the hourly chart of ETH/USD (data feed via Kraken). The pair start a fresh rally above $2,300 as long as it is above the $2,000 support zone. Ethereum Price Is Showing Positive Signs After forming a base above $2,000, ethereum started a steady increase . ETH broke the $2,200 resistance zone and it settled nicely above the 100 hourly simple moving average. The price even spiked above the $2,250 resistance level. However, the price seems to be struggling to gain pace above $2,250, similar to bitcoin . A high is formed near $2,285 and ether is now correcting lower. There was...

DeFi isn’t dead, it just needs to fix these 3 critical problems

It’s been a rough year for DeFi, and it may not get any better until projects focus more on security, regulation and usability. The persistent challenges  decentralized finance  face have been well documented by a handful of analysts and the recent collapse of the Terra ecosystem re-enforced the fact that something is critically wrong with DeFi. I think DeFi today is completely broken for 99% of the population. The promise of a more transparent financial system has been overtaken by greed. UST/LUNA is just the latest in a string of bad developments: — Peter Yang (@petergyang) May 11, 2022 Let's take a look at what experts say DeFi needs to do in order to have another revival.  Improved usability To date, the promise of open and uncensored access to a global decentralized financial system has been largely hampered by the complicated interface, confusing multi-step staking processes and lack of clarity surrounding the yields on various tokens. What do you thi...

ENS DAO delegates offer perspective on DAO governance and decentralized identity

AlphaWallet CEO and Spruce co-founder talk about their roles as contributors to the Ethereum Name Service following the project's recent airdrop. Earlier this month, the Ethereum Name Service, or ENS, formed a decentralized autonomous organization, or DAO, for the ENS community.  Cointelegraph spoke to two ENS DAO delegates who applied for the opportunity to represent the community and stay involved in the decision making process: Victor Zhang, CEO of AlphaWallet, an open source Ethereum wallet, and Gregory Rocco, co-founder of Spruce, a decentralized ID and data toolkit for developers. Zhang spoke about his experience as an external contributor to ENS and an early supporter since 2018. Zhang initially sought to help ENS by offering Alpha Wallet as a user-friendly tool for  resolving .eth names and cryptocurrency wallet addresses. Essentially, if a user inputs an .eth name in the AlphaWallet, it will show the wallet address, and vice versa using reverse resolution. Alpha...